Friday, June 25, 2010

Re-View

I went to see...Re-View







Re-View, is an on-going exhibition displaying the most significant works from all three Harvard Art Museums in one space. It is being hosted at the Arthur M. Sackler while the Fogg Art Museum at 32 Quincy Street undergoes renovations, scheduled to be completed in 2013.
The intent of the visit was to find out how the museum deals with object rotation in an on-going exhibition, to attract first-time visitors, and more importantly encourage repeat visits.
Re-View is divided into three main exhibit areas each on a separate floor of the museum; Western Tradition: Antiquity to 1900, Asian and Islamic Art: 5000 BC to Present, and European and American Art since 1900.
The European and American Art section explores early 20th century European landscape works (e.g. Gustav Klimt’s Pear Tree, 1903), and cubism (Pablo Picasso’s analytic cubism in the form of The Pomegranate), in addition to American modernism from artists such as Kerry James Marshal, and works of non-traditional media.
The Western Tradition: Antiquity to 1900, includes Ancient and Byzantine Art, with coins and seals from the Greek and Roman empires, and the Renaissance and Western Art from 1560 to 1900. Noteworthy here is the Fogg’s self-portrait of Van Gogh, dedicated to Gauguin in 1888, one of about 37 self-portraits of the artist available worldwide.
Interestingly, in the Western Art section, one can find a theme of the nineteenth century response to “Oriental” culture; this includes among others Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres’ Odalisque with a Slave and Delacroix’s Turk Surrendering to a Greek Horseman, which portray the western exoticization of the Orient. A 16th century Safavid brass torch stand “mash’all” is displayed in close proximity to William Michael Harnett’s Still Life with Bric-a-Brac (1878), an oil painting featuring the same torch stand as a centerpiece.
The Asian gallery contains both religious and secular objects primarily from East Asia with some examples from South and South East Asia. Some areas explored include Chinese and Korean Ceramics; blue and white porcelains, bronze, and other ornaments.
Aside from being the temporary host to this assorted exhibition, the Sackler’s main focus is Islamic and Later Indian Art. It holds a small but focused Islamic art collection with its strength mostly in paintings, drawings, and artifacts representing the Mongol, Timurid, Safavid, Qajar periods in Persia, and the Ottoman dynasty, while it evidently lacks Mamluk pieces from Egypt and Syria.
The introductory panel to the Islamic Art gallery attempts to explain the elusiveness of the term “Islamic Art.” It states that “here, it designates works of art produced in lands where the rulers or the majority of the population followed or follow the faith of Islam. The panel echoes the dilemma that often haunts Islamic art scholars. Since Islamic art is a result of the synergy of ethnic, geographic, local and pan-Islamic artistic expressions, it should be defined as a cultural aspect not a religious one. The gallery explores calligraphy and the reverence of Islamic text in this form of art. Overall, it succeeds in demonstrating how migrations across Islamic lands transferred the aesthetics different parts of the Islamic world.
The south wall of the gallery, reserved for temporary installations of light-sensitive objects displays the temporary exhibition: Strolling Through Isfahan: Seventeenth Century Paintings from Safavid Iran (reviewed separately).
It maybe worth asking; how does a museum host an exhibition of a somewhat “foreign” nature, without the threat of overshadowing its own core collection, and losing its own identity in the process?
It is perhaps for that same reason that Re-View makes it rather difficult for a visitor to know which object came from which of the three museums. It seems like a rather intentional approach; to integrate the collection into one entity. Other than sparse clues hidden in the labels, a first-time visitor has no way of recognizing that the Fogg is an American, modern and contemporary art museum, that the Busch-Reisinger is devoted to Euro-Germanic art, while all the Byzantine, Islamic, Asian and Later Indian pieces come from the host museum- the Sackler.
It is important to note that the mission of the Harvard University Art Museums, as a collective identity, is to collect, teach and preserve in order to enhance research and scholarship in the history of art, particularly within the Harvard community. The nature of the Sackler makes the target audience mostly students and scholars, which in turn also allows for the use of a sophisticated label language, a benefit that other museums may not share, and one that was fully demonstrated in the labels of Re-View.
The accompanying brochure provides adequate information about the galleries as well as the pieces highlighted within. It does however lack information about future plans of changes to the displays to entice visitors to come back when new objects are highlighted. The exhibition provides cellphone audio tours as an innovative means of interpretation.
All in all, it is impressive how new objects were introduced, some layouts have changed, and new juxtapositions were created, while still keeping in line with the essence of the exhibition.
Even for those who have seen Re-View before, a repeat visit will be quite a new experience.
In the end, I am glad I went to see....Re-View.




Eurpean and American Art since 1900 Gallery







Gustav Klimt, Pear Tree, 1903, oil and casein on canvas





Pablo Picasso, The Pomegranate (1911-12), oil on canvas









Kerry James Marshall, untitled (2008), acrylic on PVC panel




















Western Tradition; Antiquity to 1900


Van Gogh, Self Portrait, dedicated to Gaugin (1888)











Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, Odalisque with a Slave (1839-40), oil on canvas










Eugene Delacroix, Turk Surrendering to a Greek Horseman (1856), oil on canvas








Torch Stand (Mash'al), Iran, Safavid, late 16th century, brass













William Michael Harnett, Still Life with Bric-a-Brac (1878), oil on canvas






Asian Gallery















Islamic Art Gallery








Gallery entrance and introductory panel








Vase with Inscription Bands and Arabesque, Mamluk, Egypt or Syria, mid 14th century, brass incised with silver inlay

One of the very few Mamluk pieces in the Sackler's collection.










Tombstone of Muhammed ibn al-Hassan ibn Muhammed, Iran, Saljuk,

12th century










Wednesday, March 3, 2010

I went to see...

Glorious Beasts in Persian Painting, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA. An exhibition at the MFA by Boston-based artist Conley Harris.
According to the introductory labels, artist Conley Harris’s interest in the subject stems from his fascination with Indian and Persian miniatures, where since 2003 he began incorporating Indian and Islamic influences into his work. By further reading the labels, the viewer understands that the exhibition displays new works by the artist that are supposed to “engage in dialogue” with the Persian miniatures in the MFA’s collection.
Harris’s paintings are fanciful scenes that are altered versions of the MFA miniatures. He creates a fusion between the historic miniatures and his new paintings by producing mostly enlarged interpretations, thereby creating new works that are “rhapsodic” in their own right, even when not compared to their MFA counterparts, a rather interesting approach. The paintings are displayed side by side with their MFA inspirations in an effort to create a contrast; Shepherd’s Pet by Harris was inspired by A Goatherd (1675), a Safavid period miniature. A Hunting Scene from Safavid Iran( 2nd half of the 16th century), a gold and opaque watercolor on paper, became an inspiration for High-Spirited Horseman. Assuming that the viewer is willing to read the labels by each painting, they describe the artist’s intent and the visual relationship between the original miniature and the newly created artwork.
When questioning the curatorial or design aspects of the exhibition in which the paintings are displayed, it is important to understand that the MFA in Boston is an example of a museum whose small but impressive Islamic Art collection has hardly changed over the years. The collection is confined to a corridor that leads to other galleries making it hard for the average viewer to stop and appreciate the artifacts. An exhibition in which such magnificent artworks are to be displayed, should be executed in a way that facilitates the “visual interpretation” of the work. Its layout should enable the viewer to understand the complexity of the theme without relying on lengthy labels. In the case of Glorious Beasts, the effect achieved by the synthesis of old and new which is the main theme, is evidently lost to the viewer. Unless one is willing to read all four or so introductory panels, and all smaller labels accompanying each artwork, the whole idea can seem utterly obscure.
Unfortunately for Glorious Beasts, the location (corridor), coupled with the choice of miniatures displayed, has neither helped the exhibition get its point across, nor has it succeed in highlighting the MFA’s collection. The contrast that Harris has tried to attain in his paintings was overshadowed by the exhibit itself, it was perhaps clear only to those seeking it, but will be completely lost to those who will pass by the Islamic Art Corridor on their way to perhaps more “exciting” parts of the museum.
In the end, I am not so glad I went to see… Glorious Beasts in Persian Painting











A Goatherd, Iran, Safavid Period, 1675, ink and watercolor on paper.














Shephard's Pet, Conley Harris. Gouache, watercolor mineral pigment (ochre), chalk pastel,sandpaper,and gesso on paper.










Hunting Scene, Iran, 2nd half of the 16th century, gold and opaque watercolor on paper.















High-Spirited Horseman, Conley Harris, watercolor, foil, chalk pastel, and mineral pigments (lapis lazuli) on paper.

Monday, January 18, 2010

The Dubai Museum
















I went to see...

The Dubai Museum.

Located in Bur Dubai, this 1787 fort that once protected the city from invaders from the sea, was turned into a museum in the early 70s. At only 3 dhs (less than 1 US dollar) for adult admission, the museum is no doubt a bargain for tourists. It is located in the middle of a market area, very easy to miss and is practically unknown to locals. Visitors are guided in a time-lined journey through Dubai’s past from arid desert and Bedouin life to marine life and pearl-diving, all prior to the oil boom.
The first galleries present visitors with a look at the old fort and some of its primitive weaponry including swords, daggers and scabbards. Later displays shed light on the city’s emergence as a strategic port of trade and depict scenes from everyday life including the souk with its potters, blacksmiths, tailors, herb and spice shops etc. The last gallery explores two important aspects of its history; shipbuilding and pearl-diving. The high-tech ceiling and the effective use of lighting and reflective mirror walls creates an impressive illusion of space in that gallery. It then becomes a reminder that you have entered into more modern times and that your journey is about to end. Like most journeys in museum exhibitions, this one ends at the museum store. Flash photography is allowed as there are no signs advising otherwise.
A definite must-see in Dubai.
I am glad I went to see…the Dubai Museum.

The old fort












































The Souk and its merchants



























Bedouin life and crafts




























Pearl-diving, fishing and shipbuilding